juno journey
ICYMI: What Practical AI Adoption Actually Looks Like in L&D
Blog
February 17, 2026
Klil Nevo
3 min read read

ICYMI: What Practical AI Adoption Actually Looks Like in L&D

Blog
ICYMI: What Practical AI Adoption Actually Looks Like in L&D
Lessons from Similarweb’s L&D Team

Challenge accepted series

February 17th 2026 | Hosted by The Learning Table & Juno Journey
Led by Itamar Katsch, Jessica Bard, and Debbie Jason

This webinar was different.

No theory. No “AI is the future.”
Just three L&D leaders from Similarweb sharing:

  • What they actually implemented
  • What didn’t work
  • What they’d do differently
  • And what’s already creating value

 

 

First — The Mindset Shift

Before tools, before workflows, before prompts…

The real shift was this:

AI adoption in L&D is not about replacing learning.
It’s about redesigning how value gets created.

The team didn’t ask:
“How can we use AI?”

They asked:
“Where are we wasting time? Where are we stuck? Where can AI unlock scale?”

That framing changes everything.


What They Actually Did (Across 3 Levels)

1️⃣ Individual Productivity

Using AI to:

  • Speed up content creation
  • Draft communications
  • Improve learning materials
  • Structure onboarding content faster

Not revolutionary.
But massively time-saving.

And here’s the important part:
They didn’t wait for perfection. They started small.


2️⃣ Team-Level Implementation

They moved from “everyone experimenting alone.”
to creating shared standards:

  • Prompt libraries
  • Best practices
  • Internal sharing of wins and failures
  • Open conversations about risks

AI became a team capability — not a private hack.

That’s when adoption accelerates.


3️⃣ Strategic Integration

The most interesting part?

They began asking:

  • How does AI reshape onboarding?
  • How do we personalize development paths?
  • How do we move from static programs to adaptive learning?

This is where AI stops being a tool
and starts influencing L&D architecture.


The Mistakes They Shared (Which I Loved)

Because this is what makes it real.

They talked about:

  • Overestimating how fast people would adopt AI
  • Underestimating the need for clear guidelines
  • Realizing that not everyone is equally comfortable experimenting
  • Discovering that excitement ≠ structured implementation

AI adoption is emotional.
Not just technical.

That was one of the biggest takeaways for me.


The Underlying Theme: Psychological Safety

Adoption didn’t grow because of mandates.

It grew because:

  • Leaders modeled experimentation
  • Failure was normalized
  • Sharing was encouraged

When people feel safe to try, they try.

And in L&D, we should know this better than anyone.


My Personal Reflection

What struck me most wasn’t the tools.

It was this:  AI adoption in L&D becomes powerful when it moves from:
“Look what this tool can do"  to  “What capability gap are we solving?”

That’s the difference between experimentation
and workforce readiness.

And Similarweb’s team is clearly thinking beyond productivity hacks — they’re thinking systemically.

That’s where the real impact lives.


🔎 The Short, To-The-Point Takeaways

  • AI adoption must start with business pain, not tool excitement
  • Small experiments beat big declarations
  • Shared learning > isolated experimentation
  • Psychological safety drives adoption
  • Governance and clarity matter early
  • Productivity wins create credibility
  • Strategic integration takes time
  • AI literacy is uneven — support accordingly
  • Leaders must model usage
  • Adoption is cultural before it is technical