Learning → business impact

Compare adoption: trained vs. untrained account owners

Usage side by side for accounts whose owners took the training and those who didn't, labeled as correlation.

Your AI asks you

The feature, whether and where you track usage and account owners, the "used it" event

I want to compare feature adoption for accounts whose owners took the training vs. those whose owners didn’t.

Use the Juno Journey connector for anything in Juno. If it isn’t connected, stop and tell me how to add it (https://docs.junojourney.com/mcp/overview).

Before you build anything, ask me:
1. The feature, the training that covers it, the date range
2. Whether and where we track product usage, and which event means “used it”
3. Where account owners are recorded (if anywhere) and how they match Juno users
4. Accounts or segments to exclude
Ask these in one message, then wait for my answers.

Check each non-Juno source is connected in this chat; if not, I’ll connect it or upload a CSV. Never estimate missing numbers.

Pull completions from Juno first and show how you matched people. If you can’t read completions here (analytics may be off for our account), I’ll upload an export from Juno.

Then build an interactive artifact: adoption for trained vs. untrained owners, counts per group and the account list. State definitions, show sample sizes and gaps, and say plainly it’s correlation, not causation. Change nothing anywhere.

Used in these journeys

Back to Journey Plays