Ready-made AI agents, each with its own job, inside Juno.

Each agent has a role and the same tools, knowledge and actions as the Juno MCP: it builds content, finds answers and courses, plans development, checks what people can do and measures what changed. No connector to set up, no prompt to write, and nothing reaches a person before someone on your side says yes.

1Trigger & Signal

  • A request typed in Juno
  • A document you import
  • A change in your HRISa new hire, a promotion
  • An event in Junoa due date, a failed quiz

2Juno, the Super Agent

Juno

  • JadenJaden builds and ships
  • JasmineJasmine finds and funds
  • JemmaJemma plans
  • JeremyJeremy validates
  • JunoJensen measures
Human approval

3Delivery & Adoption

  • A course or a lesson
  • An answer
  • A plan
  • A budget request
  • A check
  • A report

4Measure

What needs a decision comes back to a named person

Not every team has an LLM wired to its systems yet.

You know AI can build the course, find the answer and pull the report, but nobody has the week it takes to set up connectors and write the prompts to get there.

One request, four agents, one approval

Example data

Six agents, six jobs, one team

  • Jaden

    live

    builds and ships

    What it's handed

    a document or a release

    What it produces

    a course, a journey, an audience

    The decision that stays yours

    you approve before it goes out

  • Jasmine

    live

    finds and funds

    What it's handed

    a question or a course request

    What it produces

    the answer, the course, the budget request

    The decision that stays yours

    the manager approves the spend

  • Jemma

    live

    plans

    What it's handed

    a goal or a new role

    What it produces

    a plan with steps, checkpoints, a mentor

    The decision that stays yours

    the employee and the manager agree it

  • Jeremy

    live

    validates

    What it's handed

    a scenario, an open question

    What it produces

    a grade and feedback

    The decision that stays yours

    a person confirms

  • Jensen

    emerging

    measures

    What it's handed

    a question the dashboard wasn't built for

    What it produces

    the answer, by person and team

  • Jamie

    roadmap

    coaches in the moment of work

Over 40% of agentic-AI projects will be abandoned by 2027, for lack of results
Gartner

So each agent has one job, a status and a person who decides.

The tools, the context and the actions, already set up

  • Juno's own tools and actions

    The same the Juno MCP exposes: find content, build it, assign it, remind, report.

  • Your content

    What already sits in Juno is found and reused before anything new is built.

  • Your company context

    Your people, teams, roles and user attributes, read from the platform you run.

  • The triggers inside Juno

    Not started · not completed · a set number of days before the due date · a failed quiz · a changed user attribute, which is how an HRIS change reaches them.

  • What you import

    A document, a file, an export: the agents start from what you bring.

  • Already run Juno from Claude or ChatGPT? The same actions are there →

    Every prompt →

What no agent decides

  • What matters

    Which skills and outcomes count in your company is your people's call.

  • What goes first

    An agent drafts; a person decides which change, team or request comes first.

  • Who is excused

    An exemption or an exception is decided by a person, never by an agent.

  • The human moments

    The welcome, the feedback, the hard conversation stay between people.

  • The decision, named

    Publishing, assigning and notifying wait for a person to say yes.

  • The job title, named

    The manager approves the spend; the employee and the manager agree the plan.

Tools you aren't permitted to use don't appear to your assistant. Trust Center

Questions people ask.

Do I need Claude or ChatGPT to use the agents?

No. The agents run inside Juno, with the same tools, knowledge and actions as the Juno MCP already set up: no connector to install and no prompt to write. If your team already runs Juno from Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot, the same actions are there, and the Juno MCP page shows how.

Does this replace my team?

No. No agent decides what matters, what goes first, who is excused or the human moments; those stay with your people. The agents take the drafting, the assembling, the searching and the counting, and each one hands a named decision back: the manager approves the spend, a person confirms a grade, you approve what goes out.

Which agents run today?

Jaden, Jasmine, Jemma and Jeremy are live. Jensen, who measures, is emerging: it works, and it is still early. Jamie, who coaches in the moment of work, is on the roadmap and is not a live capability. Each agent's status is printed beside its name on this page, and it changes here when it changes in the product.

What happens when one gets it wrong?

It stops at the approval. Nothing an agent prepares publishes, assigns or notifies before a person says yes, so a wrong draft is corrected or turned down there. A new automation is created paused until someone enables it, and an open question can be graded by a person, or graded by the AI and confirmed by a reviewer.

Can I add checkpoints?

Yes. Checkpoints are placed per phase when the journey is configured: several, one or none, wherever a person should look before the next step runs. Whatever you place, what an agent prepares still waits for a person before it publishes, assigns or notifies, so a checkpoint adds a review and never removes one.

Who can see what?

An agent works within what the person using it is allowed to do. Which capabilities are available depends on your plan and your admin's settings, and tools you aren't permitted to use don't appear to your assistant. Your security team can review the certifications, sub-processors and policies in the Trust Center.

How much do the agents cost?

Pricing is published on the Pricing page.