Compare adoption: trained vs untrained accounts

I want to compare feature adoption for accounts whose owners took the training vs. those whose owners didn’t.

Use the Juno Journey connector for anything in Juno. If it isn’t connected, stop and tell me how to add it (https://docs.junojourney.com/mcp/overview).

Before you build anything, ask me:
1. The feature, the training that covers it, the date range
2. Whether and where we track product usage, and which event means “used it”
3. Where account owners are recorded (if anywhere) and how they match Juno users
4. Accounts or segments to exclude
Ask these in one message, then wait for my answers.

In that same first message, also ask me my role and the team I support, and which CRM we use. Then check each one is connected in this chat; if not, I'll connect it or upload an export. Never guess what is in it.

Check each non-Juno source is connected in this chat; if not, I’ll connect it or upload a CSV. Never estimate missing numbers.

Pull completions from Juno first and show how you matched people. If you can’t read completions here (analytics may be off for our account), I’ll upload an export from Juno.

Then build an interactive artifact: adoption for trained vs. untrained owners, counts per group and the account list. State definitions, show sample sizes and gaps, and say plainly it’s correlation, not causation. Change nothing anywhere.

If this assistant supports artifacts connected to Juno, build it as an interactive artifact that re-reads Juno each time I open it, and say so; otherwise build it static and show the date the data was read.

Routine: after the first run, offer to repeat this every quarter. If this assistant can run scheduled tasks, set one up only after I approve it; if not, give me a one-line prompt I can re-run.